OFAC BitPay Resolution Highlights Relevance of Compliance

On Feb. 18, 2021, the U.S. Section of the Treasury’s Office environment of Foreign Assets Regulate (OFAC) declared a $507,375 settlement with BitPay, Inc., an Atlanta-based mostly payment processing business that enables retailers to settle for electronic forex, for a lot more than 2,100 clear violations of U.S. economic sanctions. The settlement serves as a timely reminder to all corporations engaged in electronic forex transactions – regardless of whether directors, exchangers, or engineering organizations and other enterprise that acknowledge electronic currency – of the value of retaining possibility-based mostly sanctions compliance controls.

According to the OFAC enforcement detect, BitPay taken care of a sanctions compliance program concentrated on screening its direct prospects, i.e., merchants who accept digital forex from prospective buyers. BitPay screened retailers towards OFAC’s List of Specifically Specified Nationals and Blocked Folks (the SDN Checklist) and conducted further owing diligence to ensure that the merchants ended up not situated in sanctioned jurisdictions, these as North Korea and Iran. But in accordance to OFAC, BitPay failed to display screen the data it acquired about the merchants’ consumers, such as buyers’ self-identified bodily and IP addresses – which in some instances indicated that buyers were situated in sanctioned jurisdictions. OFAC states that by processing transactions in these situations, BitPay enabled folks in sanctioned jurisdictions (i.e., Crimea, Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Sudan, and Syria) to interact in approximately $129,000 truly worth of digital forex transactions with BitPay’s merchant customers.

Though the amount of income concerned contains a modest share of BitPay’s all round company, BitPay could have been liable for in excess of $600 million in fines. In agreeing to resolve the subject for a comparatively modest volume, OFAC viewed as, amid other matters, that BitPay experienced sanctions compliance controls in area all over the applicable time, that it properly trained its staff members on sanctions limits, that it cooperated with OFAC’s investigation, and that it experienced agreed to carry out certain modifications, which includes blocking IP addresses that appear to originate in sanctioned jurisdictions and demanding proof of buyer identification for transactions around $3,000. Yet, experienced BitPay disclosed the violations voluntarily, OFAC may perhaps have even further lowered the great or foregone a high-quality solely.

Supplied the important awareness getting compensated to the anti-dollars laundering (AML) obligations of electronic forex suppliers and exchangers, OFAC’s settlement with BitPay serves as a reminder of the equivalent great importance of sanctions compliance in the digital forex house. And unlike the Financial institution Secrecy Act, which imposes AML program needs only on these enterprises defined as “financial institutions” (a group that incorporates digital income transmitters like BitPay), U.S. sanctions regulations implement to all U.S. persons. Accordingly, all corporations involved in the digital forex area, including know-how companies and other organization that take digital payments, would do very well to review their sanctions compliance packages, together with their treatment of IP deal with data.

Of class, a buyer’s IP deal with does not usually precisely reflect a customer’s accurate place, for instance, if an specific works by using Tor and/or a digital personal community (VPN) to access the net. Nonetheless, OFAC’s settlement with BitPay sends the message that businesses ought to, at a minimal, have an understanding of what identification and location information is readily available to them and tailor their threat-centered compliance protocols appropriately.


©2020 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All legal rights reserved.
Nationwide Law Evaluation, Volume XI, Number 55